The
Star Wars franchise had quite an artistic comeback last winter. Not everyone was over the moon of Yavin about
The Force Awakens, but when even my former colleague Richard von Busack--the Metro Newspapers film critic who prefers the Bond movies and Alexander Salkind's Superman movies over the
Star Wars franchise as '70s and '80s tentpole entertainment and has found the
Star Wars flicks to be too much like
bad '70s Sid and Marty Krofft kids' shows--
considered parts of
The Force Awakens to be genuinely moving and more akin to something like
Robin and Marian rather than a Krofft show, you know it's an above-average
Star Wars installment.
I found
The Force Awakens to be satisfying as well, even though the film totally wasted Gwendoline Christie (
Game of Thrones reduced her screen time as Brienne of Tarth last season for this, a role where she never says anything memorable and never takes off her helmet?) and
Raid stars
Yayan Ruhian and Iko Uwais. You don't hire Mad Dog and Rama to just stand around and become people-shaped snacks for a giant space monster two minutes later. You hire them to smash people's noggins in with their knees and
break motherfuckers' legs with their bare hands.
Now it's
Star Trek's turn to experience an artistic comeback as a sci-fi multimedia franchise after a major low point, and the timing for its potential comeback is perfect because 2016 marks the 50th anniversary of the original
Star Trek's premiere on NBC. I don't know why Paramount doesn't acknowledge
1964 as
Star Trek's birth year: that was when Lucille Ball, who was breaking ground as the female head of an indie TV studio, took a chance on
Star Trek, and Ball's Desilu studio, writer/producer Gene Roddenberry and director Robert Butler began filming "The Cage," the first of two pilot episodes for
Star Trek. So
Star Trek is actually 52 years old, but who's counting--aside from Poindexter in a basement somewhere in Yonkers, who claims to be the world's only expert on the exact time and date when Roddenberry first started typing up the "Cage" writer's bible about
"Captain Robert M. April"?
Paramount has two major
Star Trek projects on the horizon: Justin Lin's
Star Trek Beyond in July and an hour-long
Star Trek anthology show from
Hannibal showrunner Bryan Fuller for the CBS All Access streaming service in 2017. I'm a fan of the episodes Lin directed for
Community and the Lin movies
Better Luck Tomorrow and
Fast Five, so I have some faith that
Star Trek Beyond won't be atrocious, especially when--in addition to a director who grew up
watching the original Star Trek on
KCOP and isn't going to turn
Trek into
godawful 9/11 truther propaganda--the threequel is co-written by cast member Simon Pegg, whose past writing credits include
the terrific Cornetto trilogy. The current J.J. Abrams-produced
Trek movies appear to be echoing the path of the
Mission: Impossible movies: the first one is a highly entertaining action flick, unless you're a hardcore fan of the source material who can't stand the changes that have been made to the material; the totally dumbed-down second one sucks ass; and the threequel appears to be a soft reboot after nobody--not even a lot of the more casual fans of the franchise--would admit to liking the second one, despite the second one making a shitload of money.
But I'm more enthusiastic about
Trek's return to TV--the medium where
Trek can be as cerebral as it wants to be and it doesn't have to dumb itself down in order to satisfy international audiences, who have always been indifferent to
Trek movies--because Nicholas Meyer, the director of two of the best
Trek flicks,
The Wrath of Khan and
The Undiscovered Country, is attached to the project. Also, Fuller--who wrote for both
Deep Space Nine and
Voyager before going on to create several short-lived and weird but enjoyable shows and envisioning, as he was working on those cult favorites, a nicely progressive take on
Trek in which Angela Bassett would get to be the captain and Rosario Dawson would be her first officer--is the perfect person to be at the helm.
I like three of the seven
Star Wars movies and Genndy Tartakovsky's
Star Wars: Clone Wars animated shorts, but my heart belongs to
Trek because at its best,
Trek has
a lot more on its mind than just action sequences and space battles, and it cast Asian actors in major, non-stereotypical roles, long before
Star Wars did the same this year when it cast newcomer
Kelly Marie Tran in a leading role for the eighth installment. Though I like
Trek slightly more than
Wars, I don't believe in pitting these two sci-fi franchises--or any other pair of sci-fi franchises--against each other as if they're
Drake and Meek Mill, which is why I've rolled my eyes when
Scrubs star Donald Faison, a
Wars nerd, publicly bashes
Trek to create beef between the
Wars contingent and the
Trek heads, or when Kevin Church, a writer who runs They Boldly Went, a Tumblr about the '60s
Trek, uses his Tumblr to bash
Doctor Who. A person can like both
Wars and
Trek at the same time (or
Trek and
Who at the same time), just like how someone doesn't have to be a Nas person or a Jay Z person. Can't a motherfucker be both? Nas and Hov are about the same quality-wise. They've both had the same amount of above-average material and lousy material. The same is true about
Wars and
Trek.
That being said,
Trek, its first three spinoffs and nine of its first 10 films are also home to some of the ugliest futuristic clothes ever stitched together in Hollywood (the outlier out of the 10 films is
First Contact, which marked the first time when, thanks to Deborah Everton, the costume designer for
The Craft,
Trek's ideas of futuristic attire looked sensible and
GQ-ish for a change and they didn't suck).
Trek costume designer William Ware Theiss' offbeat work on the '60s show isn't totally ugly. I'm a red-blooded male--I like looking at the female guest stars slinking around in
skin-baring costumes created by Theiss. Those costumes are the highlights of Theiss' work. But the uniform tops Theiss designed for Starfleet, especially the male officers, don't look like uniform tops made for a futuristic space Navy. They look more like
softball ringer T-shirts. I keep expecting to see Spock run out a bunt. The brightly colored
Starfleet uniforms were intended to capitalize on the rise of color TV and showcase NBC's visual advances as the self-proclaimed
"Full Color Network," but in 2016, the cartoony and cheap-looking velour shirts just look strange and can occasionally take attention away from the drama during a dead-serious, non-campy and exemplary episode like
"Balance of Terror."At least the '60s uniforms aren't as hideous as costume designer Robert Fletcher's Starfleet uniform redesigns in
Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Sure, it's great that female officers finally got to wear pants again, 13 years after
"The Corbomite Maneuver" threw away their pants and required them to wear only
miniskirts, but otherwise, the
Star Trek: TMP outfits are the ugliest clothes in all of
Trek.
Entertainment Weekly's Darren Franich, who's been
reassessing each of the
Trek movies because of the franchise's 50th anniversary, came up with a great description for the epic fail that was the
TMP revamp of both the uniforms and the
Enterprise set design color schemes: the beige, gray, light brown and off-white clothes look like furniture, and the furniture looks like clothes.
![Enterprise engineer Ron Burgundy clearly isn't enjoying the shit out of this meeting.]()
Gene Roddenberry wanted no traces of militarism in the
TMP uniforms, which doesn't make much sense because then they end up not looking like uniforms anymore. The result of Roddenberry's demands was pajamas straight out of a creepy commune instead of a futuristic space Navy.
It's interesting how the worst uniforms in
Trek history were followed by the best: for
The Wrath of Khan, Fletcher recolored and heavily
tweaked his own much-maligned
TMP uniforms, and without Roddenberry in charge anymore, he finally made the uniforms actually look like uniforms. The off-duty clothes weren't as good though--those costumes looked as if
Botany 500 butt-fucked
Space: 1999, especially when Dr. McCoy complemented his beige
Roger Moore safari
outfit with a Mr. Furley ascot during
the Genesis trilogy.
The off-duty (or civilian) outfits continued to uglify when
Star Trek: The Next Generation came along, and Theiss
returned to
Trek to stick Wesley Crusher in drippy Cosby sweaters no ordinary teen would ever be caught dead in. Wesley's duds are the kind of futuristic fashion that's about as hip as the music of black Republican rapper
Aspiring Mogul--or as hip as that time when Rick Berman, perhaps influenced by
Armageddon and
its Diane Warren-penned Aerosmith theme, thought it would be a good idea to modernize the music of
Trek during
the Enterprise opening titles by rehashing Rod Stewart's sappy, Diane Warren-penned theme from
Patch Adams. Theiss also gave Starfleet a fashion makeover that hearkened back to the comic strip colors of the '60s, but instead of velour softball tees, he outfitted the officers this time in spandex bobsled jumpsuits. Costume designer
Robert Blackman later had to revamp the
Next Generation uniforms and replace the tight-fitting spandex suits with two-piece wool costumes in order to put an end to some back problems Patrick Stewart developed from looking like an
Albanian bobsledder at the Winter Olympics. Blackman's modifications to the Theiss design were also intended to make the uniforms look more noble and heroic, and if a cast member's waistline started to expand due to either pregnancy or too many plates of
gagh from the craft services table in between takes, a two-piece wool outfit would be able to make it look somewhat flattering, unlike
Buddy Love's favorite fabric.
Despite their cheesiness, the Theiss uniforms aren't so awful-looking that they completely ruin the storytelling during
Trek, and it's easy to see why
Trek fans--particularly those who, unlike me, don't care that psychedelic-era Kirk and Spock look like softball jocks instead of space Navy men--are in love with the Theiss uniforms, whether those unis are from the original
Trek or
The Next Generation: the simplicity of the Theiss designs makes the costumes easy to recreate when they cosplay as their favorite characters. Just grab a black undershirt and a bright yellow sweatshirt, and you're automatically Kirk or Sulu, ready to face the universe or whatever photon torpedoes the Klingons hurl at you.
Anyone can easily look like they serve in Starfleet, so that's why I'm amused and, like Spock would say, fascinated by online photos of people who dress like characters from one of my favorite sci-fi franchises without realizing they look like them. Ever since I stumbled into a 2009 photo of a passenger in a Hong Kong train who looked like he was promoting the release of J.J. Abrams' first
Trek movie, I've been collecting pics of accidental
Trek cosplay.
Trek's 50th anniversary means it's the perfect time for me to take those pics of accidental
Trek cosplay that I've found and compile them on Tumblr, as well as track down a few new ones to add to my new Tumblr, which I'm calling
Accidental Star Trek Cosplay. Preppies and grandmas aren't the only folks who dress like they're being chased around space by Borg cubes. A lot of news anchors and meteorologists appear to be into accidental
Trek cosplay as well.
Hmm, I wonder why no one's accidentally cosplaying as the characters during their
TMP phase. I guess puke-colored unitards that look like furniture are passé this century.
While Accidental
Star Trek Cosplay warps into the fashion frontier during the 50th anniversary, here's an oldie but goodie from
June 20, 2014, in which I looked at a fan-made movie trailer that's not exactly
an Honest Trailer for the horribly dressed
TMP, but like
what Jamie Lee Curtis did to a dorky-looking black dress with nothing more than her bare hands in
True Lies, it stylishly trims the tedious 1979 movie down to just a few of its best parts.
***
A fan-made Star Trek: The Motion Picture trailer from 2013 does a better job of selling Robert Wise's mixed bag of a film than the original 1979 trailers did
Mission Log is an excellent
Star Trek podcast I've previously written about
here and more recently
here. Hosts Ken Ray and John Champion have undertaken an ambitious mission: to analyze every single episode of
Star Trek and its TV and movie spinoffs, from 1965 to 2005 (I'm not sure if they'll reach
2009 and
2013, but I already know bits and pieces of what Ray thinks of 2013, and I assume a lot of it is going to be him saying, "Orciiiiiiii!").
The two
Star Trek fans want to find out which older
Trek episodes stand the test of time, especially in the age of both the
antihero on cable and more sophisticated sci-fi shows like former
Deep Space Nine writer Ronald D. Moore's
Battlestar Galactica, former
DS9 writer Ira Steven Behr's much-missed creation
Alphas and the current BBC America hit
Orphan Black. Anyone who either currently writes for TV or is, like me, considering transitioning to that kind of career ought to listen to
Mission Log. The audience gets to learn a lot from Ray and Champion about the things episodic TV from any era does effectively and the things episodic TV--especially TV in the '60s, long before the game-changing, novelistic
Hill Street Blues or
Game of Thrones--didn't do so effectively. For instance, if the '60s
Trek were made for TV today, Edith Keeler's death at the end of "The City on the Edge of Forever" would have deeply affected Kirk's character for the rest of the series, and exploring his grief and guilt over Edith's death would have been a much better move than how the '60s
Trek handled her death afterward, and that was to oddly brush Edith aside and completely forget about her as if she were yet another
dead Cartwright
bride.
Ray and Champion have reached the '80s
Trek feature films
by this point, and after they did their
analysis of Robert Wise's
Star Trek: The Motion Picture last week (Ray doesn't think the 1979 film stands the test of time, while Champion thinks it still does), a
Mission Log listener from Norcross, Georgia named Alex Bales posted on the podcast's Facebook wall a fan-made
TMP trailer he produced. Unless it's made by the people behind the Screen Junkies channel's Honest Trailers series or
Ivan Guerrero, I don't care for fan-made movie trailers, but Bales' trailer is a rare fan-made trailer I actually like--and even more so than the 1979 film itself.
TMP is
a mixed bag of a film. It's a rehash of concepts from both the 1967
Trek episode "The Changeling" and
2001: A Space Odyssey that were better executed in those '60s productions.
TMP ripped off
2001's "evolution into a superior life form" finale (the film even recruited
2001 visual FX genius Douglas Trumbull, who was also involved with
Close Encounters, a smash hit that, along with the success of
Star Wars, spurred Paramount to rush a
Trek feature film into production). I get that Wise and Gene Roddenberry wanted to make the last great old-fashioned space epic (
TMP was one of the last Hollywood epics that opened with
an overture before flashing the studio logo), and while I kind of appreciate how
TMP chose to emulate the contemplative and moody
2001 instead of the then-frequently duplicated
Star Wars, plopping crowd-pleasing heroes like Kirk and Spock and quippy secondary characters like McCoy and Scotty into the clinical tone of
2001 is like asking
Kendrick Lamar to rhyme over polka music. It's not going to work.
We want to see Kirk, Spock and McCoy wittily sniping at each other and debating over serious ethical dilemmas or fighting their way out of trouble like they frequently did on the '60s show (and would later frequently do in Nicholas Meyer's superior
Trek films). We don't want to see them gawking silently for 15 minutes at pothead-friendly laser light show FX. Even Wise's previous '70s sci-fi procedural, the equally clinically toned but much superior
Andromeda Strain, had more humor and personality than this film, McCoy snarking about Spock being "warm and sociable as ever" aside.
Scottish
Daily Dot writer Gavia Baker-Whitelaw runs Hello, Tailor!, a blog that analyzes costume design in geek-friendly movies ranging from
TMP to the Marvel Cinematic Universe blockbusters, and in
a biting Hello, Tailor! critique of
TMP costume designer Robert Fletcher's ugly Starfleet uniform redesigns that's a must-read, she summed up
TMP best. She called it "a three-hour screensaver interspersed with shots of William Shatner emoting into the middle distance."
Watching Bales' well-edited fan-made trailer made me notice that Paramount and whatever trailer house it hired in 1979 had no idea how to work around the weak material of this three-hour screensaver and market the film effectively, as evidenced in its Orson Welles-narrated teaser trailer and final trailer. Sure, the film wasn't finished and Jerry Goldsmith's incredible score--the strongest element of
TMP--hadn't been recorded yet when the trailer house worked on the teaser, so they didn't have much footage to choose from. But aside from that still-amazing-looking model of the refitted
Enterprise in drydock, they chose the least interesting footage--and the least enticing score music, some atonal,
THX Deep Note-style synth piece.
Good God, Lemon, the Irwin Allen disaster flick music and the synth church organ cue in the final trailer are even worse than the THX Flat Note. And the announcer who's not Charles Foster Kane is the worst announcer in an illustrious history of
Trek trailer and promo announcers that's included Welles,
Hal Douglas,
Christopher Plummer,
Ernie "The Loooove Boat" Anderson,
Don LaFontaine and
Phil Terrence. The announcer in the final trailer has all the gravitas of
Derek from Teenagers from Outer Space. I think maybe it is actually Derek from
Teenagers from Outer Space.
It's too bad Goldsmith's score wasn't completed at the time because that would have helped the dully narrated final trailer immensely, like how "Leaving Drydock" and "Ilia's Theme" added so much awe to
TMP's Welles-narrated TV spots, which were a vast improvement over the two trailers (and were remastered in 2012 by
TMP"Director's Edition" visual FX supervisor Daren R. Dochterman, which explains why these TV spots from 1979 look as good as
Betsy Russell and Marisa Tomei). Despite the appropriate gravitas of Welles during the teaser, neither trailer would make me want to watch the film, whereas Bales' trailer does.
What Bales gets right that the 1979 trailer house behind the two trailers didn't is emotionally involving the viewers. He accomplishes that by 1) using "What Do You See?," a powerful--without being overbearing--John Murphy score cue from a sci-fi film I haven't seen yet (and I'm kicking myself for not having seen it), Danny Boyle's
Sunshine; 2) choosing the perfect clips to go with the Murphy score cue; and 3) focusing on the best and most dramatically satisfying part of
TMP's otherwise derivative and uninvolving story (and it's dramatically satisfying only during the "Director's Edition" that was assembled for DVD in 2001 and, unfortunately, hasn't been remastered for Blu-ray). That part would have to be Spock's lifelong inner conflict over his biracial heritage and his search for some sort of meaning in his life, which mirrors the V'Ger entity's search for its creator (Spock's arc also contains my favorite sequence in the film and the one lengthy V'Ger FX sequence that works, the genuinely gripping "Spock walk" sequence). Bales' trailer embodies the emotional depth that Baker-Whitelaw said was what "made the original
Star Trek series so compelling" and was too absent for her tastes during
TMP.
Is it me or does late '70s movie trailer making just really suck,
1979 Alien teaser trailers aside? The cluelessness of Paramount and
TMP's trailer house reminds me of Warner Bros. Family Entertainment's cluelessness when they had to market
Batman: Mask of the Phantasm, an above-average 1993 animated film that was understandably difficult to market because it was too adult for kids and too kiddie for adults who were immune to the pleasures of
Batman: The Animated Series. But instead of rolling up their sleeves and pulling a Don Draper/Peggy Olson all-nighter to tackle this marketing dilemma, WBFE's ad department came up with
the laziest written copy for a Batman movie marketing campaign ever: "America's most exciting and legendary motion picture hero comes to the screen like you've never seen him before, in an all-new, larger-than-life feature film." Why so tedious?
Though he first posted the fan-made trailer in 2013, Bales looks as if he took a cue from last month's
"9 (Short) Storytelling Tips from a Master of Movie Trailers." To get some advice on how to be effective at modern movie trailer making, Co.Create turned to John Long, co-founder of Buddha Jones, the trailer house behind
Muppets Most Wanted's Golden Trailer Award-winning
"Across the Internet" TV spot, the first TV spot for a movie that's actually made me laugh out loud in ages. One of Long's tips is "you have to hook people immediately whether it's a great piece of dialogue between characters, an unexpected jolt of some kind or a wonderful piece of music. Then, you need to escalate." That's exactly what Bales does: hooking the viewer with both Spock's "Why am I here?" line and "What Do You See?" and then escalating. The result is a trailer that makes
TMP appear to be a better film than the three-hour screensaver it actually is.